Remembering Identity
نویسنده
چکیده
* Most of the work on this volume was accomplished during my stay as Fellow at the National Humanities Center in North Carolina. I express my deep appreciation of the vibrant intellectual atmosphere at the Center and acknowledge the generosity of the National Endowment for the Humanities which funded my fellowship. I also acknowledge the copyeditor Bela Malik whose intelligence and meticulousness made it a pleasure to work on the book's publication. 1 Alon Confino, ‘Collective Memory and Cultural History: Problems of Method’, American Historical Review, 102, December 1997, 1387. 2 The literature published to date on problems of memory and identity, often overlapping, is enormous. For an important survey of the field with a very extensive bibliography until 1998 see Jeffrey K. Olick and Joyce Robbins, ‘Social Memory Studies: From “Collective Memory” to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices’, Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1998, 105–40. The interplay of the two central notions of memory and identity is discussed by John Gillis, ‘Memory and Identity: The History of a Relationship’, Richard Handler, ‘Is “Identity” a Useful Cross-Cultural Concept?’ and David Lowenthal, ‘Identity, Heritage, and History’, all in John R. Gillis, ed., Commemorations: The Politics of National Identity, Princeton University Press, 1994, 3–57. See also Debbora Battaglia, ed., Rhetorics of Self-Making, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1995; Kathryn Woodward, ed., Identity and Difference, London: Sage, 1997. For a more focused survey of the historical literature see the American Historical Review Forum on ‘History and Memory’ with Susan A. Crane, Alon Confino and Daniel James, American Historical Review, 102, December 1997, 1371–412; the special issue ‘Memory and the Nation’, Social Science History, 22, 4, winter 1998 (contributions by Jeffrey Olick, Frederick Corney, Simonetta Falasca-Zamponi, Lyn Spillman, Francesca Poletta and Uri Ram); Anne Ollila, ed., Historical Perspectives on Memory, Helsinki: SHS, 1999; Patrick Hutton, ‘Historiography: Recent Scholarship on Memory and History’, The History Teacher, 33, 4, 2000, 533–48; Saul Friedländer, ‘History, Memory, and the Historian: Dilemmas and Responsibilities’, New German Critique, 80, 2000, 3–16; the special issue ‘Grounds for Remembering’, Representations, 69, winter 2000 (contributions by Thomas Laqueur, Stuart Semmel, Ulrich Baer, Barbara Mann, Idith Zertal, and especially Kerwin Lee Klein, ‘On the Emergence of Memory
منابع مشابه
Autobiographical Memory and Flexible Remembering: Gender Differences
In this study, we examined gender differences in: (1) a flexible remembering task, that asked for episodic memory decisions at an item-specific versus category-based level, and (2) the retrieval specificity of autobiographical memory during free recall. Differences favouring women were found on both measures. Furthermore, a significant association was observed, across gender groups, between lev...
متن کاملRemembering the Historical Roots of Remembering the Personal Past
As scholars, remembering the historical past in one’s area of study provides a foundation for purposefully pursuing knowledge. As individuals, remembering our personal past provides direction and purpose in everyday life. Taken together, these percepts provide the impetus for the current paper, which traces the contributions of six early pioneers who wrote about how humans remember their person...
متن کاملCombining Perception and Experience in Spatial Categorization
Two experiments examined how categories derived from experience and those derived from perception affect spatial memory. Four kinds of objects were distributed within a circle and spatially clustered so that all objects of each kind appeared within the same spatial region. These identity-based categories were either aligned with or in opposition to the perceptuallybased quadrant categories that...
متن کاملWhat Links the Chain: An Essay on Organizational Remembering as Practice
In this essay, we review, critique, and reconceptualize organization theory’s understanding of organizational memory. We find that organization theorists have underestimated the historicity of memory, its associative character, and social-psychological constitution. The critical impetus of the literature review translates in the body of the paper into an alternative perspective that posits orga...
متن کاملCollective memory: conceptual foundations and theoretical approaches.
In order to outline the conceptual landscape that frames discussions of collective memory, three oppositions are proposed: collective memory versus collective remembering; history versus collective memory; and individual memory versus collective remembering. From this perspective collective remembering is viewed as an active process that often involves contention and contestation among people r...
متن کامل